Octane requirement?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

someotherguy

Truly Awesome
Joined
Sep 28, 2013
Messages
10,039
Reaction score
14,829
Location
Houston TX
I lived at 7500 ft up in Evergreen CO for a couple years. A stock 93 454 will be absolutely so slow. Run the cheapest, there is hardly any oxygen at that altitude anyways. The DA at Bandimere routinely hit 10,000 ft in the summer and that was 2000 ft lower. Try driving to the top of MT Evans at 14,000 feet and my C5 Zo6 couldn't get out of its own way...
If that's the case (I'm not used to high altitude driving - at all) - I wonder if the 85 would be a smarter bet? It's at least 2 octane points more volatile than 87. :)

Richard
 

Supercharged111

Truly Awesome
Joined
Aug 20, 2015
Messages
12,797
Reaction score
15,664
If that's the case (I'm not used to high altitude driving - at all) - I wonder if the 85 would be a smarter bet? It's at least 2 octane points more volatile than 87. :)

Richard

That's where I can't get a good answer. In closed loop, I'd say no. But in open loop, I still say no. Dependent upon the margin of the tune of course. I can't speak for TBI stuff, but I know for a fact the Vortec stuff leaves a ton on the table everywhere. All you're doing there is eating into your margin IMO, I still don't think the altitude buys you margin on an EFI vehicle.
 

PlayingWithTBI

2022 Truck of the Year
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
9,709
Reaction score
15,115
Location
Tonopah, AZ
I can't speak for TBI stuff, but I know for a fact the Vortec stuff leaves a ton on the table everywhere
TBI did too, especially with lower compression than Vortec but, I thought higher octane helped to reduce KCs in higher elevations? Of course you can always reduce SA and make it a dog too :(
 

thegawd

I'm Done!
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Messages
2,265
Reaction score
4,254
Location
The Country Formerly Known as Canada!
here let me google that for you... ;) haha heres a screenshot.... it would seem supercharged is absolutely right. 85 octane works well in carbureted engines but not so well with modern EFI.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Schurkey

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
11,236
Reaction score
14,218
Location
The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
I used to drive through Casper/Rawlins WY and got fuel there and other places at high altitude on I-80.

My '92 and '93 Lumina 3.4L DOHC engines tolerated 85 octane just fine at altitude.

I wouldn't be the least bit concerned about 85 octane at ~7K altitude. But a person could connect a scan tool and look at the knock sensor activity. No, or mild knock sensor activity, no problem.
 

GoToGuy

I'm Awesome
Joined
Sep 16, 2020
Messages
3,142
Reaction score
3,691
Location
CAL
Using an 85 in computer controlled engine, would conflict with operating parameters of powertrain. Regular octane fuel 87. Manifold pressure, temp, timing, all factors and conditions based on first element of equation 87 octane.
 

LC2NLS6

I'm Awesome
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
272
Reaction score
225
Location
MI
TBI engines have minimal timing anyways. It'll be fine. Octane is just a rating of resistance to detonation. Raise your hand if you lived at 7500 ft, as in my place was at 7500 ft and I'd drive to the resorts to snowboard every chance I could. It'll run rich most likely to start with anyways.
 
Top