someotherguy
Truly Awesome
If that's the case (I'm not used to high altitude driving - at all) - I wonder if the 85 would be a smarter bet? It's at least 2 octane points more volatile than 87.I lived at 7500 ft up in Evergreen CO for a couple years. A stock 93 454 will be absolutely so slow. Run the cheapest, there is hardly any oxygen at that altitude anyways. The DA at Bandimere routinely hit 10,000 ft in the summer and that was 2000 ft lower. Try driving to the top of MT Evans at 14,000 feet and my C5 Zo6 couldn't get out of its own way...
Richard