You're right that the cams affect camber and caster. Toe is set elsewhere. Issue is, there's a limited amount of adjustment, and you've gotta get camber AND caster adjusted adequately with what travel is available with the cams. It's not a huge surprise that the cams wouldn't be positioned the same, side-to-side once the alignment is complete.
Don't adjust ANYTHING until you get the alignment equipment connected. It's pointless to lose your existing "close-enough" alignment until you're set up and ready to make it exact.
You may not get camber and/or caster where you want. You may have to compromise caster (not a tire-wearing angle) to get appropriate camber (tire-wearing angle.)
Theoretically, camber and caster are adequately adjusted with the bolts in the middle of the slots. That's why GM can leave the knock-outs in place--they think their manufacturing process is precise enough to eliminate camber/caster adjustment on all vehicles, leaving a few outliers to have the knockouts removed, and a proper alignment performed under warranty (or by enthusiasts, decades after warranty has expired.)
For the record, it's a waste of time, money, effort, and enthusiasm to perform an alignment on any vehicle that has worn (or bent) suspension components. The simple truth is that on modern vehicles, the manufacturing really is precise enough for 99% of owners; as long as the suspension is in really-good condition. Sagging springs, wiped-out control arm bushings, worn ball joints or tie rod ends...any one or more failing components will destroy any hope of achieving and retaining proper alignment angles under dynamic conditions.