shorepatrol
I'm Awesome
Rebuilt the entire front end. This is the alignment spec sheet with before and after. Thoughts
You must be registered for see images attach
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Exactly the input I was looking for. I have some positive camber after alignment. I replaced every front end part so bad parts isn't the problem. Truck drives like a dream after alignment, but I see bad tire wear coming. I'll take it back to the shop and see what they say. Thanks for the inputI fought and fought , and fought with my alignment and I have had a GMT 400 since 1999. I will tell you that, these trucks like negative camber. Your camber is set to positive camber. The GM specs for these trucks is 0.5 positive camber, plus or minus 0.5. So from 1.0 to 0.0 is within spec. but IMO I think GM meant to put a - in front of the 0.5. So it would be -0.5 (If you can get some one to set your camber at that) because that is not in spec Just keep a close ye on your tire ware. Just Watch to see if your outer edge starts wearing. I had bad upper control arm bushings that were bad, but not real bad. I was getting a lot of ware on the drivers side tire, on the otter edge. We had a guy come by our machine shop a few weeks ago who works for a local tire shop. I said look at my truck, He looked and said I had to much positive camber, so I took it to him that Saturday. He found the bad bushings, replaced them and did an alignment. He did not give me a print out, but the tires look straight, and I am no longer eating up the out side edge of my drivers tire.
I have around 1/16" of toe in, no idea what that is in degrees.
Tire diameter comes into play...1/16" = 0.125 (total Toe in) = 0.23873103309890856 degree (based on a 30" tire diameter)
https://robrobinette.com/ConvertToeInchesToDegrees.htm
Old thread revival. Per the alignment sheet posted, these trucks are supposed to be toe-out correct?