SOmerhing to think about.
Background: my father (and me in me recent years) have rebuilt,serviced, and re-valved snowmobile and dirtbike shocks. Most companies run a 25w oil. We decided not to pay through our posterior for this exspesive hydrolic oil and to knock it off. Bombardier shock oil ( we run mostly ski-doo) is MilSpec 5606. We found out in our research that it is rebottled 5606 aircraft landing gear fluid. MilSpec is a military grading for oil, 5606 like any other will have a inch thick book on viscosity, retension, contamination...etc.
The story: synthetics started in the aviation industry, and not because they are/were any better. They don't burn! The theory was that crashing a plane full Of synthetics as aposed to castor oils is much less of a flame infested scenario. It took them three years to meet "MilSpec" 5606 with a synthetic oil. It took that long to make a synthetic come close to a castor oil for performance?
I don't believe through all the research done in my house that synthetics are any better, I believe both castor and synthetics have good properties. Castor fOr lubrication, ( great for high horsepower 2-stroke crank bearings) and synthetics seem to last a little longer before contaminating ( shocks) and survive high heat a little better.
Oil cOmpanies have done a great sell job on both. And I think as long as you run the specified oil, dispite being synthetic or not, keep the oil clean and don't break it down with heat, you will be fine . Just my opinion tho.