delta_p
OBS Chevrolet, When Silverado Was A Trim
definitely destroyed it.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Like already said, if it had a stepside bed, or better yet, an old stepside bed, it would help some, but I don't think it would make it "good looking"
Reminds me of the Studebaker/S10 kit you could buy, back in the day. Except the S10 version looks a little better. https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/0602st-1939-studebaker-truck-kit/
Another thing that stands out BIG TIME is the mismatch in wheel openings. The soft-squared GMT400 bed wheel opening vs. completely round front fender opening are glaring mismatches, impossible to ignore.
As 454 mentioned, the cab/bed body line mismatch is almost surely rusted cab mounts.
The grille work is very poorly executed and amateurish, as is the front "bumper" area. Can't see any hood line so I'll assume it's a tilt front end, which explains why we don't see any pictures straight on from the sides, or hard angle from the front, because tilt front ends rarely fit well/look good at the lower fender area where they depart.
It's a junk pile I would be hard-pressed to pay part-out prices for, because nothing on the body has any value to me.
Richard
So... we have a better sense of style than you expected?And I'm surprised. I figured more folks would approve than disapprove. I was wrong.
Yeah, have quite a few of those too on 67-72's. Not my thing either.I'm the guy that even thinks the GMT400 stepside bed transplanted onto a 60-66 or 67-72 truck looks awful, so I'm pretty damn picky about the mix-and-match. But some people really love that swap.
Richard