4.3L 262 V6 questions

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Joined
Apr 30, 2021
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Location
canada
Hi everyone I have a 1994 c1500 with a 262 and I was wondering what would be the biggest cam I can run with only having to change out the lifters if possible. (I am not putting a V8 in this truck it's all numbers matching MK3 truck and I want to be a bit unique with the build as everyone puts the 350 in them)
 

Schurkey

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
11,210
Reaction score
14,173
Location
The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
what would be the biggest cam I can run with only having to change out the lifters if possible.
One huge enough to totally screw-up the usefulness of the truck.

Not recommended. Hot-rodding a V-6 is fairly pointless unless you've got GM resources and a turbocharger.

Make sure the engine (and the whole vehicle) is running as good as GM intended, then live with what you have. There's no easy or inexpensive way to jack up the power level, which is exactly why folks rip out the V6 then put 5.7L engines in.
 

PlayingWithTBI

2022 Truck of the Year
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
9,699
Reaction score
15,082
Location
Tonopah, AZ
Give it fertility pills and hopefully it'll grow 2 more cylinders (same stroke and bore as the 5.7L) :anitoof::driver:
 

VIKING_MECHANIC

GMT 400 obsessed Swede.
Joined
Jul 12, 2020
Messages
861
Reaction score
1,778
Location
Arkansas
I was planning on doing a mild cam for my 4.3 in my 97 K1500, but decided not to for a few reasons.

1. Finding any mild/aggressive cams for a V6 is getting hard to find. I didn't want to spend the $300+ on a cam.

2. In my particular case, I have the Vortec V6 and I'd have to reprogram the computer for the new cam.

3. I'll be using this truck for towing and having a mild/aggressive cam wouldn't make sense...
 

JonP

Newbie
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
10
Reaction score
17
Location
06478
Not true at all. V6’s can be brought to bear quite a lot of power, I’ve routinely gotten 300hp from the Buick 3.8 (231) with a bore, balance, blueprint, cam and carb update. The 4.1
Only needed the balance, blueprint, cam and carb. This is from an advertised 190hp engine. The Chevy 4.3 can be tuned to get its best power and torque with all the similar efficiency updates afforded to its big brother v8: ignition induction and cam. What do you want to tune the engine to do? All production car and truck engines are median tuned, so they will work across the entire line of vehicles. Also, they weren’t adjusted to meet maximum potential. As such the engine in you truck wasn’t factory tuned for a truck, by adjusting it to meet a truck over a car power needs. I’m partial to compcams, I run 268H in most of the small blocks I’ve built, including 283’s.


One huge enough to totally screw-up the usefulness of the truck.

Not recommended. Hot-rodding a V-6 is fairly pointless unless you've got GM resources and a turbocharger.

Make sure the engine (and the whole vehicle) is running as good as GM intended, then live with what you have. There's no easy or inexpensive way to jack up the power level, which is exactly why folks rip out the V6 then put 5.7L engines in.
 

454cid

Sooper Pooper
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
8,083
Reaction score
9,082
Location
The 26th State
Not true at all. V6’s can be brought to bear quite a lot of power, I’ve routinely gotten 300hp from the Buick 3.8 (231) with a bore, balance, blueprint, cam and carb update. The 4.1
Only needed the balance, blueprint, cam and carb. This is from an advertised 190hp engine. The Chevy 4.3 can be tuned to get its best power and torque with all the similar efficiency updates afforded to its big brother v8: ignition induction and cam. What do you want to tune the engine to do? All production car and truck engines are median tuned, so they will work across the entire line of vehicles. Also, they weren’t adjusted to meet maximum potential. As such the engine in you truck wasn’t factory tuned for a truck, by adjusting it to meet a truck over a car power needs. I’m partial to compcams, I run 268H in most of the small blocks I’ve built, including 283’s.

I think the deal is that you've got to spend so much money on a 4.3L or 305 to get decent numbers, but be almost there with a stock 350. With the Buick, you don't have a modern Buick V8 to parrallel the Chevy. Buick/GM stopped building the 350 Buick after 1980 and all the performance engineering went into the 3.8L. You've got to got back in time (69/70) for Buick V8 performance. Of course there are modern HiPo Buick parts but they're super expensive.... TA Performance.
 

RI Chevy guy

OBS Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
55
Reaction score
44
Location
Cumberland, RI
I've done this to my '96 C1500, it's expensive depending on how far you want to go with it. I bought the truck with a blown engine, I knew I wanted more power out of it, but also knew this was going to be my daily driver and had to be able to afford to feed it. Did a solid bottom end, upped compression a bit, gasket match port job, short tube headers, Comp 266HR cam, everything I needed to head toward 300hp. Now the hard part, maintain full emissions control (I live in New England, we have emission testing), finding a 30PPH spider injector to get the necessary fuel to the engine is difficult and very expensive, and then tuning. Throw in a rear gear change and some transmission upgrades and you have a giant pain in the ass to get everything working the way it's supposed to. With yours being a 94 you're still running TBI and OBD-1, switching to a marine intake and an upgraded injector seems to be a much easier upgrade than what I dealt with, but a few notes: I've run back and forth quite a bit with cam selection, part of me is very happy with how mine is turning out, but wonder if I should have went with the next step down (durations more like 206/210, more bottom end, works with stock fuel and tuning), might have saved me some trouble. Second, these engines don't require a lot of air- calculations showed my engine needed just under 500 cam to work properly with the modifications I've made. Resist the urge to overfeed the 4.3, it's not a 350 and doesn't require 700 cfm to get the gains you're after. These are great engines, you can do a lot with them, and in my case the difference between 12mpg (typical V8) and 18 mpg is huge, given a 30 mile trip to work everyday. Good luck!
 

Kobo_Dyger

Newbie
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Location
Minnesota
A Class II cam would be on par with a marine cam.
If you can find a newer set of heads I'd swap them; I took a set off a 2012 and port matched for my 98.
Intake there's plenty of carb/efi available it's just preference.
 
Top