Your situation kind of reminds me when we would get 2 or 3 of the same new part that wouldn't
work for us on aircraft. It should have fixed the write up, but didn't. In these special cases, we
would cannibalize a 'known good, flown good' part from another jet, and sure enough, now the first
jet would start working as expected. To verify, we would take one of the new/suspect parts, run
it in the Cann'd jet, and it would fail. I would then initiate a QDR. (Quality Deficiency Report.)
And eventually we would find out that a new supplier had come online...and they were having issues
with their stuff.
****
Of course, you probably don't have the luxury of a known good vehicle with the same engine in it
so that we could Cann(ibalize) the knock sensor and verify that the rest of the Knock Sensor circuitry
is good in your truck? :0)
****
Regarding your Tek 2245. I went down the TI white paper (rabbit hole
**) you linked to. And on p. 16
they discussed whether you would need an 8 or 10-bit A/D converter in order to have enough resolution
to handle the total signal from the knock sensor:
You must be registered for see images attach
So, this validates the 6V pk/pk signals I was seeing with my old Tek 475 while tapping on that engine block. (And that
old scope has a good track record -- I spelunk with it inside audio amps on occasion.)
At this point, I don't know.
* Go to the treasure yard and pull two or three good looking ones from identical engines for a song? Bring them
home, thread them into your block, (not vise) connect up your 2245, and see if you can get a similar output to the video?
* Buddy has an engine on a stand, and won't be needing his sensor for a short while?
* Find a NOS sensor?
* Or maybe someone in here can recommend a different brand that's been working for them recently?
Keep us in the loop -- thanks!
**(See attached.)