Schurkey is there a scan tool you like and recommend for these early GMT400s?
I have a Snap-On MTG-2500. This is very much like the MT2500, which is cheaper and more common.T I recommend a Fap-Off [Snap-On] MT2500.
They've been obsolete for years. The last software update was for 2009 model year, and they quit selling them before that. OTOH, if you aren't using them for vehicles newer than you can get a software cartridge for (2006 and older is fairly common. I don't think I've ever seen one for model years newer than that.) then they're an inexpensive solution.
My software cartridges are for 1980 1/2 to 1999, and from 1996 to 2006 (Domestic brands--GM, Ford, Chrysler, Jeep) I have some 1996-2005 Asian coverage, too.
You'd need the adapters and keys to suit the vehicles you're going to test. OBD-1 uses a heap of adapters, at least one for every make; GM has three or four. OBD-II uses the same adapter, but may--or may not--require a circuit-board "Key". Key K-9 is common for GM; and what I need to get some ABS codes and data on my '98 Monte Carlo, for example.
Now...Do I recommend these '2500s? Yes, conditionally. They're old. At some point they're going to have functional problems. And of course, you can't get them serviced or updated by Snap-On any more.
I've been threatening to update my scan tool to something newer for years. And someday, it'll happen. I'm looking at another Snap-On, in the Solus series. (Solus, Solus Pro, Solus Ultra, Solus Edge) All but the newest are similarly obsolete and non-supported except maybe for software updates.
There's also the computer-based solutions, of which I have ZERO experience. I don't even know someone who has one. I know that they exist, they don't cost much, and folks seem to like them--but these folks are also the sort that have never used a professional-grade scan tool. They have little to compare with.
I would rather have a used-but-usable Professional-Grade scan tool than a brand-new consumer-grade scan tool. And if it won't do ABS and body computers, and instrument clusters, with some bi-directional activity, I want nothing to do with it. All of that was "old news" twenty years ago.