What bad information and where 'above' do you see it?
If you're simply referring to the power consumption margin between the 60 and 80, I understood it to be closer to 10-15% more power but will further research and have it corrected if need be. I don't recall posting about the specific stall speeds for the TCs between those two transmissions if that's what you're referring to as 'bad information'. Besides a looser stall will multiply torque for a longer duration along the RPM curve than a tighter one so vehicles with higher stall converters will generally be quicker, all other things held largely equal (as I'm sure you already know).
Also, please indicate where I posted about the vette servo's intro date(s) and applications. Most every 4L60E that I have seen and know to be original to the vehicle and never worked on had 553 second gear servos other than vettes, F-bodies, GTOs and some of the higher end sub-model truck and SUVs but 093s make their way into a great many 700R4s and 4L60Es after the fact. My own 5.3 Z71 Tahoe came from the factory with a 553 servo, not an 093. My neighbor's 2001 Tahoe (original owner, never touched transmission other than fluid changes), also a 4x4 that I rebuilt last week had a 553 not an 093 installed.
I know full well the Vette servo has nothing to do w/4th gear so not sure if that's in response to a post of mine or someone else's. If it's mine, please indicate the post number and/or thread if different than this one and I'll take a look and edit (or ask moderators to edit if I cannot) to clarify if the wording is confusing...Take the below screenshot of post #5 in this thread as shown below. Notice I mention the undersized 2nd gear servo apply piston in the third bullet down - clearly I'm referring to the fact that servo only applies to 2nd gear. And when I mention 'later' I don't give a date or date range here, just allude to the fact that the 093 servo started w/the vettes then migrated across other makes/models.
Perhaps there's another post you're referring to?
You must be registered for see images attach
Are you the original owner of all of those vehicles mentioned that came with a Vette servo in the transmissions?
Do you know for a fact they have never been worked on previously?
Perhaps you are and perhaps they did come w/an 093s from the factory but an overwhelming the 5.3L equipped 4L60Es and even some of the 4L65Es in trucks/SUVs that I have ever seen had the 553 servo - I know as I tore one down this past weekend and it had a 553 servo in it. Was surprised but the unit was otherwise untouched. Maybe it was apart of one or more option packages but never specified - who knows.
I'm not trying to be argumentative but at the same token, I want to fully understand what exactly you're referring to in your post, especially when you say things like
Apart of the horsepower consumption figure for the 80 vs 60 which I mentioned on the first page in post #5 and can have corrected if this is not accurate, I'm not seeing anything else you've implied was wrong, either here or elsewhere. So if there is in fact some stuff that's either wrong or confusing, please be specific about where so that I can correct it or ask the staff to do so on my behalf.
This way everyone benefits and no one is led astray.
I'm not perfect, no one is so if some of my information is wrong, I will acknowledge and correct it (or have it fixed) asap.
TIA