bensblueburban
Newbie
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2013
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
I have a 1997 Suburban K1500 with a 6" RCD lift under it. I have been running 315/70R17 BFG AT's for the past 5 years. With 72,000 miles on them, they are almost worn out & its time for some new tires.
I have loved the BFG's & they have stood up to everything I have dished out. No problems whatsoever. I am equally impressed that I will be able to hit 75,000 miles on them too, but that was probably due to me rotating them every 3,000 miles.
I am looking at BFG AT's again, BFG MT's, and Toyo Open Country MT's. I'm trying to decide on 35" Toyos, 35" BFG AT, 35" BFG MT, 37" BFG AT, or 37" BFG MT.
After 5 years with the AT's & so much luck with them, I should just go with the same thing again. However, I kind of want to switch things up if I am going to have these tires for the next 5 years.
I have decided that I would be happy with the BFG AT's again if I got them in a 37". They are the same exact width as the 35" & they only weigh about 7 pounds more than the 35". I would only get the Toyo MT's in a 35" due to the weight, gas mileage loss, and punishment the 37" Toyo would put on my front end parts. I am still concerned that the 35" Toyos would kill my gas mileage, braking distance, acceleration, and front end parts due to the fact that they are almost 20 lbs heavier than the 35" BFG AT's.
I know how notorious 37" tires are for tearing up front end parts, axles, etc, but would a BFG AT in a 37" size have much of an affect versus the 35" BFG AT's I already have? They are the same width & only a few pounds heavier than the 35's. They also only measure out to a true 36.3".
I also already have 4.88 gears in my axles, so that wouldn't be a problem. My main concern would be with fitment and whether I would tear up more parts with the BFG 37's? How much trimming would I have to do to fit BFG AT's or MT's in a 37" size? My front & rear bumpers are ranchhands now, so I wouldn't need to trim the front bumper. Just the rear part of the quarter panel. Another thing to note for the 37's is that I have Mickey Thompson Classic II's that are 17x9 with 4.5" of backspacing. Do you think I can fit the BFG 37's in there?
How much of a drastic difference would the switch from my current BFG AT's to the Toyo MT's be? My gas mileage already sucks as is, so I'm afraid those heavy Toyo's will kill it even more.
If I can fit the 37" BFG AT's, then I thought why not switch it up still & go with a 37" BFG MT? The MT's are only a few pounds heavier than the AT, so I have put that as an option as well.
So, I guess I'm asking everyone's opinion of the BFG All Terrain TA, the BFG Mud Terrain KM2, and the Toyo Open Country MT first?
Next, I am asking whether you would stick with the 35" tire size I have now, and also whether you would go with the Toyo or one of the BFG's in the 35" size?
Then finally if you would bump it up to the 37" tires in the BFG, since the only difference from the 35" tires is the weight?
Thanks!
Ben
I have loved the BFG's & they have stood up to everything I have dished out. No problems whatsoever. I am equally impressed that I will be able to hit 75,000 miles on them too, but that was probably due to me rotating them every 3,000 miles.
I am looking at BFG AT's again, BFG MT's, and Toyo Open Country MT's. I'm trying to decide on 35" Toyos, 35" BFG AT, 35" BFG MT, 37" BFG AT, or 37" BFG MT.
After 5 years with the AT's & so much luck with them, I should just go with the same thing again. However, I kind of want to switch things up if I am going to have these tires for the next 5 years.
I have decided that I would be happy with the BFG AT's again if I got them in a 37". They are the same exact width as the 35" & they only weigh about 7 pounds more than the 35". I would only get the Toyo MT's in a 35" due to the weight, gas mileage loss, and punishment the 37" Toyo would put on my front end parts. I am still concerned that the 35" Toyos would kill my gas mileage, braking distance, acceleration, and front end parts due to the fact that they are almost 20 lbs heavier than the 35" BFG AT's.
I know how notorious 37" tires are for tearing up front end parts, axles, etc, but would a BFG AT in a 37" size have much of an affect versus the 35" BFG AT's I already have? They are the same width & only a few pounds heavier than the 35's. They also only measure out to a true 36.3".
I also already have 4.88 gears in my axles, so that wouldn't be a problem. My main concern would be with fitment and whether I would tear up more parts with the BFG 37's? How much trimming would I have to do to fit BFG AT's or MT's in a 37" size? My front & rear bumpers are ranchhands now, so I wouldn't need to trim the front bumper. Just the rear part of the quarter panel. Another thing to note for the 37's is that I have Mickey Thompson Classic II's that are 17x9 with 4.5" of backspacing. Do you think I can fit the BFG 37's in there?
How much of a drastic difference would the switch from my current BFG AT's to the Toyo MT's be? My gas mileage already sucks as is, so I'm afraid those heavy Toyo's will kill it even more.
If I can fit the 37" BFG AT's, then I thought why not switch it up still & go with a 37" BFG MT? The MT's are only a few pounds heavier than the AT, so I have put that as an option as well.
So, I guess I'm asking everyone's opinion of the BFG All Terrain TA, the BFG Mud Terrain KM2, and the Toyo Open Country MT first?
Next, I am asking whether you would stick with the 35" tire size I have now, and also whether you would go with the Toyo or one of the BFG's in the 35" size?
Then finally if you would bump it up to the 37" tires in the BFG, since the only difference from the 35" tires is the weight?
Thanks!
Ben