Interesting perspective.
Where'd you get your info from?
I personally know one of the guys who was personally involved with marketing them and all the rest of it (he was personal friends with the inventor).
The stories he told me disagree with your narrative.
For example, out on the other coast from me (Daytona Beach) is where the big races happened.
Apparently the FISH cars raced faster than the usual champions who were sponsored by the local dealerships and other financial concerns.
The reason why the FISH failed is largely b/c it's marketing and sales were sabotaged by 'the big 3', who had contracts with 'preferred vendors' who were loath to give up their sales to a nobody in the auto industry.
Besides that, when there's a fuel problem with a carbureted vehicle, there's about 1/100 the amount of possible causes compared to today's EFI bullsh*t.
I'll take mechanical fuel delivery any day of the week over what passes for digital vehicles today...ANY DAY.
Case in point: The vehicle I'm currently working on would have been fixed in avbout 3 hours, maybe 4, instead of 3 f'ing days (and it's still not fixed!), IF it had a bad carburetor.
But with the EFI that it 'was born with', which precipitated all the stupid sh*t the previous owner did to it to SIMPLIFY IT b/c he didn't like the EFI, seriously complicated the repair, and made it 10x more expensive than if it was merely a carburetor.
Another case in point: My MB C230 would have been fixed already IF it didn't have that STUPID saddle bag gas tank that has an even more STUPID fuel delivery system. So far I'm stuck fixing it b/c I can't get parts that should be readily available. But if it was carbureted (SU or Stromberg, excellent carbs!), it would have been fixed 3 years ago (that's THREE F'ING YEARS compared to 3 hours!). These MB's last decades if taken care of, and the g.d. mfgr knows it. So in order to soak the public, they quit manufacturing parts, or the aftermarket people quit doing it, so they can 'retire' the cars and SELL NEW ONES. There are so many things wrong with that scenario on so many levels that it's not worth detailing it any further.
In addition, there's the pesky problem if DIAGNOSTICS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE. That alone complicates this venue in a way that would take volumes to detail.
So, after 10 years of fixing digital vehicles (and appliances) compared to 40 years fixing mechanical vehicles, I arrived at this fact-based conclusion: THERE'S NO WAY IN THE WORLD THAT ANYONE CAN LEGITIMATELY CLAIM THAT EFI IS LESS COSTLY AND EASIER TO REPAIR THAN CARBURETED ENGINES (not including DIESEL), NO WAY, EVER.
Where'd you get your info from?
I personally know one of the guys who was personally involved with marketing them and all the rest of it (he was personal friends with the inventor).
The stories he told me disagree with your narrative.
For example, out on the other coast from me (Daytona Beach) is where the big races happened.
Apparently the FISH cars raced faster than the usual champions who were sponsored by the local dealerships and other financial concerns.
The reason why the FISH failed is largely b/c it's marketing and sales were sabotaged by 'the big 3', who had contracts with 'preferred vendors' who were loath to give up their sales to a nobody in the auto industry.
Besides that, when there's a fuel problem with a carbureted vehicle, there's about 1/100 the amount of possible causes compared to today's EFI bullsh*t.
I'll take mechanical fuel delivery any day of the week over what passes for digital vehicles today...ANY DAY.
Case in point: The vehicle I'm currently working on would have been fixed in avbout 3 hours, maybe 4, instead of 3 f'ing days (and it's still not fixed!), IF it had a bad carburetor.
But with the EFI that it 'was born with', which precipitated all the stupid sh*t the previous owner did to it to SIMPLIFY IT b/c he didn't like the EFI, seriously complicated the repair, and made it 10x more expensive than if it was merely a carburetor.
Another case in point: My MB C230 would have been fixed already IF it didn't have that STUPID saddle bag gas tank that has an even more STUPID fuel delivery system. So far I'm stuck fixing it b/c I can't get parts that should be readily available. But if it was carbureted (SU or Stromberg, excellent carbs!), it would have been fixed 3 years ago (that's THREE F'ING YEARS compared to 3 hours!). These MB's last decades if taken care of, and the g.d. mfgr knows it. So in order to soak the public, they quit manufacturing parts, or the aftermarket people quit doing it, so they can 'retire' the cars and SELL NEW ONES. There are so many things wrong with that scenario on so many levels that it's not worth detailing it any further.
In addition, there's the pesky problem if DIAGNOSTICS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE. That alone complicates this venue in a way that would take volumes to detail.
So, after 10 years of fixing digital vehicles (and appliances) compared to 40 years fixing mechanical vehicles, I arrived at this fact-based conclusion: THERE'S NO WAY IN THE WORLD THAT ANYONE CAN LEGITIMATELY CLAIM THAT EFI IS LESS COSTLY AND EASIER TO REPAIR THAN CARBURETED ENGINES (not including DIESEL), NO WAY, EVER.
Last edited: