I'm pretty sure the engine will go till next spring so I'm really thinking of doing another engine but using a well known in spokane machine shop to check things over before any assembly. Then putting the parts in I request to my satisfaction.
And taking everyone here along for the ride!
As a fellow GMT400 big block owner, over here in upstate NY I am really feeling your pain
& frustration concerning this (to date) Bad Actor 454.
Since you mentioned that your original engine was smooth, but the new engine was
never as smooth...so obviously you aren't chasing a phantom issue. In other words,
this specific engine bay
** was (and still is?) capable of supporting a smoothly running L29.
And so far no joy, but *not* due to lack of trying. You have alternated between black box
and 0411. You have had gone to the trouble to verifying the fuel injectors all flowed the
same. Several passes at the ignition system. Used a temp gun on the cats, then went on
to measure the actual exhaust back pressure. Fuel pressure checks. Been capturing/sharing
data with a scan tool. Etc., etc.
****
Man i aint got enough energy for all that! Hats off to you!
I may not be to bright or methodical but i am tenacious.
I'm not the disagreeable type, but in this I beg to differ.
Anyone swapping between the black box <> 0411 box more than once for t-shooting
purposes, or checking for equal spark on all 8 individual wires, I'm thinking that you are
working at a pretty high level. And I think we need to upgrade you from tenacious to this:
You must be registered for see images attach
(Compliment, BTW)
And me? I don't mind a problem...but I *hate* a mystery. So, IF you go ahead & persist
with fixing this, I would like to offer the following remote support:
* I have a known-good, smooth-running '99 L29. It is currently still running off of the
original black box that the truck was built with. IF you would like one or more items
cross-checked in my engine bay for proper operation I will
cheerfully do this. (ie: Giving
you what we used to call "known-good, flown good" parts to troubleshoot with --
considered 'better than new'. (!)
* Our current problem definition is a rough-running misfire that defies diagnosis. This
to me has the feel of test procedures / test equipment that has insufficient resolution
for narrowing this misfire down. But I don't know for sure. Therefore, although I still
don't know where I am finally going to end up with for troubleshooting tools, I'm thinking
that for now I'll get the same/similar tools as you and see what kind of misfire counts that I
get over here under my hood, and then we can compare. (ie: Just how clean/misfire-free
can a '99-spec 454 run on today's 90/10 gas/corn diet?)
Are we looking more carefully at how these big blocks run than 99% of the folks still
using them? (I don't *think* so?) At any rate, I really want to understand all this *before*
it happens to
me, so it only makes sense to get involved from a purely selfish standpoint. :0)
And not if, but when we figure all this out it will be good data for others down the road.
Got a few other ideas, but the main point of this is that IF you decide to start fresh &
really put this to bed once & for all, I will be happy to assist in any way I can, up to and
including using my own truck to try to replicate what you are seeing.
What can I say? We troubleshooters have to stick together, through thick & thin...
:0)
**aka: "Power Barn" (courtesy @ralmo94 - I like that!)