I didn't realize WinALDL only interfaced with 160 baud ECMs, learn something new every daySoftware was named WinALDL. Worked on all the older GM stuff with a 160 baud rate.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
I didn't realize WinALDL only interfaced with 160 baud ECMs, learn something new every daySoftware was named WinALDL. Worked on all the older GM stuff with a 160 baud rate.
Graphed and Histogram average tables. The early stuff had really slow data stream. 1 round of data every 1.2 seconds. However the later TPI, LT1 and 91+ trucks with electronic transmissions like the 4L60E and 4L80E had much faster data baud rates. 160 baud vs 8192 baudCan the data stream from obd1 be graphed? When looking at older vehicles I'm a little leery of obd1, just because of diagnostics. Everything I currently have is obd2 or carb/points.
If you only knew how much I despise that remake, but the analogy fit.LOL, I like the "Gone in 60 Seconds" reference.
I have the sense that I ruffled some feathers on this site when pretty-much every post I made was "check fuel pressure, connect a scan tool and look at the data stream--verify every sensor..." But working on computer-controlled vehicles without being able to interrogate the computer is two steps away from hopeless.
Here's an example of TunerPro RT data logging on my 88 1227747 (160 baud) before I upgaded to the EBL (8192).Can the data stream from obd1 be graphed? When looking at older vehicles I'm a little leery of obd1, just because of diagnostics.