optimal MPG mods

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Status
Not open for further replies.

98_k1500

strange noises are normal
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
3,927
Reaction score
78
Location
Starkville, MS
Yah I think I'll just bolt a piece of plywood to the front of my trucks

Thats what im saying. a lowered truck gets better mileage because its less air between the pavement and the top of the cab that has to get out of the way. Not because it is actually closer to the ground... I mean, airplanes get decent mpg right??
 

GMRedline

I'm Awesome
Joined
Dec 13, 2013
Messages
435
Reaction score
75
Location
Packer Country
delete catt.convO2 sensor now calls for rich mode

Not really. The rear O2 doesn't control fueling. It is only there to check to make sure the cat is operating properly. The front O2 (pre cat) controls the fueling.

This is all true. And a low thermostat will not allow the engine to get to proper temp [also if the computer is still hooked up, it won't stay in closed loop] and will cause it to run richer, using more fuel.

It looks like the closed loop thresholds are much lower then expected. Tune file from a 1999 Suburban k1500

You must be registered for see images attach


Closed Loop is enable at 133* and LTFTs are enabled at 140*.

I was also surprised to see no spark modifiers to help the engine get up to temp faster.

You must be registered for see images attach


The Spark adders stop at 25* and the spark retard doesn't start until 208* under heavy load.

I agree with you that it is not good to take the vehicle out of it's optimal operating range. Apparently GM relies heavily on mechanical devices like a thremostat and clutch fan to determine exactly what the optimal operating range is....
 

Blue95

I'm Awesome
Joined
Aug 21, 2011
Messages
1,439
Reaction score
33
Location
Union, MO
I am not understanding how air hitting a vertical piece of plastic is going to increase MPG. By his reasoning, if i extended my valence all the way to the ground, it would get better mileage.

Yes you would, again physics is always in play.

I guess too much science makes me the idiot, typical on here.
 

Blue95

I'm Awesome
Joined
Aug 21, 2011
Messages
1,439
Reaction score
33
Location
Union, MO
Thats what im saying. a lowered truck gets better mileage because its less air between the pavement and the top of the cab that has to get out of the way. Not because it is actually closer to the ground... I mean, airplanes get decent mpg right??

Air flows smoothly over the top of a vehicle, not underneath it, it hits suspension parts, cross members, etc. Turbulent air causes resistance thus causing a higher drag coefficient. Air will always go under the truck, but how much and how it travels under is the whole point here.

Yes lowered is less of a footprint in the air, but also less air under the truck.
 

thz71

Stock SUCKS!
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
18,183
Reaction score
1,210
Location
Iowa
Yes you would, again physics is always in play.

I guess too much science makes me the idiot, typical on here.
You keep saying physics but no examples or facts if your just trying to sound smart it's not working. And feel free to leave
 

polar

I'm Awesome
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
3,929
Reaction score
52
Location
Northville,Mi
I'm not gonna argue on here but the valence is there to reduce airflow under the truck because it creates drag. Drag will create resistance that will make the truck work harder to achieve the rpms needed. When you work harder it decreases mpg. Yes it will make a minimal difference on mpg but the OP should be worry about his valence. His lift and offset rims/tires are causing more of a drag than the valence
 
Last edited:

thz71

Stock SUCKS!
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
18,183
Reaction score
1,210
Location
Iowa
I'm not gonna argue on here but the valence is there to reduce airflow under the truck because it creates drag. Drag will create resistance that will make the truck work harder to achieve the rpms needed. When you work harder it decreases mpg. Yes it will make a minimal difference on mpg but the OP should be worry about his valence. His lift and offset rims/tires are causing more of a drag than the valence
So you're saying if i put a valence on my truck it'll make a measurable difference in mpg? You're a smart guy you can't honestly believe that.
 

polar

I'm Awesome
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
3,929
Reaction score
52
Location
Northville,Mi
IMO it's not worth worrying about it on a lifted truck. They look a lot better without the valence. You don't lift a truck when you are trying to achieve mpg.
 

thz71

Stock SUCKS!
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
18,183
Reaction score
1,210
Location
Iowa
Read it again. It will make a difference but it is minimal.
Exactly my point this thread is about how he lost 6 mpg! Not .06 mpg. Hence why I said the valence made no difference then the blue 95 guy got all butt hurt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top