I like the plastic-block clamps to secure the hose. I think you need at least one more, looks like the two hoses are rubbing together between the existing clamps, up from the steering gear. I'm a little concerned about bend-radius of the hose as it goes around the steering gear and on to the PS reservoir. And I see tyraps on the hoses in other places; they shouldn't be used because hoses shouldn't be allowed to rub against each other.
For the record, despite Summit and others harping on "AN", the AN standard is decades obsolete and
no longer in use. Virtually all so-called "AN" fittings sold today are in fact equivalent to the also-obsolete "JIC" standard.
"AN" was short for "Army/Navy". It was genuine
aerospace grade stuff, hugely expensive and tightly quality-inspected. NOBODY puts aerospace-grade plumbing on a street-driven car. By comparison, the old "JIC" (Joint Industries Council) standard was intended from the beginning for ground-based vehicles--cars, trucks, buses--and looks similar to AN, but with less-rigorous standards and reduced QA. It was "industrial grade" not "aerospace grade". The sealing taper is the same as AN (37 degrees) and the thread pitch (but not the
thread form!) is the same, too. The quality is NOT the same. You could put AN on a bus, but you wouldn't be allowed to put JIC on a fighter plane, even though the fittings would screw together just fine.
When Summit and Jegs and all the rest pretend to sell you "AN" aerospace plumbing, they're
really selling the equivalent of the old "JIC" industrial-grade fittings. It's basically a scam, they're delibrately misleading people. And
most folks still biitch about the price of the industrial-grade stuff.
For "AN", the new standard is MIL-F-5509; for"JIC", the new standards are part of the SAE and ISO systems--SAE J514/ISO-8434-2.
Are JIC and AN hydraulic fittings the same thing? Air-Way digs in to uncover whether or not JIC and AN are related.
www.air-way.com