Fairly close to the same with proper charge. I have found it easier to overcharge a R152a system because the capacity is much less. My van is 68 oz R134a and I think I have it slightly overcharged with about 38 oz total in the system. Given that I have a different orifice tube, compressor and condensor my old charge level that worked is off a bit.
Is your objective to charge the system with the same volume of refrigerant?
As I know you know, but which some readers may not have recognized, is that the system can only accommodate a certain volume of refrigerant; that is one consideration in the “refrigerant substitution” game.
The density of R134a is 4.25 kg/m³.
That of R152a is 2.7 kg/m³.
So I might assume one would substitute ~40oz of R152a for 64oz of R134a, i.e., scaled by the ratio of their densities.
Comments? I’m learning here, not pontificating.
Next, I assume the orifice tube is selected to provide a similar product for the "mass flow" * "heat of vaporization". I suppose this is practically the same as saying "select the orifice tube to achieve the proper vent temperature" under similar conditions.
Then, the compressor volume per revolution relationship comes into play, but I’ll save that thought.
Note: It may appear I’m mixing-up my dimensions here by scaling the oz (weight) of refrigerant using densities given in terms of kg/m³, but that’s not the case; by dividing one density by the other, the result is a dimensionless scalar. So, the resulting refrigerant amount is still oz (weight).