The way that I have always been able to tell if a block was 4 bolt or 2 bolt on the TBI engines is if it has a fuel pump block off plate installed on it, MOST 1500/2500 under 8600 GVW did not have the block bored for a fuel pump push rod and MOST 3500's had the block bored for the fuel pump push rod even though the trucks had electric fuel pumps.
I've got a Vortec engine with fuel pump blockoff plate, drilled for engine-mounted fuel pump. 4-bolt mains.
I've got a service-replacement "crate engine" for a '91--'93 TBI Caprice with a blockoff plate, NOT drilled for an engine-mounted fuel pump. 2-bolt mains
I've got a Vortec engine, no blockoff plate, of course not drilled. 2-bolt mains.
I've got a TBI block that someone threw Vortec heads on, and sold it to me as a "Vortec" engine, has a blockoff plate, but not drilled. 2-bolt mains. (Just like the TBI Caprice engine)
Four engines is not much of a sample. It seems that the blockoff plate by itself means very little. It's the drillings for the fuel pump pushrod and the oil drainback BEHIND the blockoff plate that might indicate 4-bolt mains.
But again, with a sample size of four blocks, and sketchy history on a couple of them, I wouldn't bet too much money on anything. Pull the pan, know for sure.
And for all of you that are buying 4 bolt TBI blocks you are also dropping your compression ratio from 9.3:1 down to 8.3:1. You also can use your RPO codes to find out what block/compression ratio that your truck has. RPO NA4 emissions = 8.6:1 ratio/4 bolt block and RPO NA1 = 9.3:1 ratio 2 bolt block.
The light-duty pickup TBI 5.7s had dished pistons. The heavy-duty TBI 5.7s had deeper dishes, or bigger chambers, or SOMETHING to reduce the compression even more. The Vortec 5.7s have dished pistons, and as far as I know they're all the same compression ratio.
However, the TBI 5.7 in the '91--'93 Caprice, Roadmaster, etc. "B-Body" have flat-top pistons, for about a 1/4 point increase in compression ratio. The B-Body engine also has the roller cam. I had a B-body engine in my K1500 for about 80,000 miles, and it ran FLAWLESSLY on the stock K1500 computer and chip. (but no big increase in either power or mileage.)
The problem is not so much the crank coming out the bottem as the fact the 4 bolts prevent the caps from walking in the block at higher rpm. 4 bolt caps are more stable because of the increased length and the extra clamping force on them from the additional outer bolts. The aftermarket splayed caps and the deep skirted block cross bolted caps are an additional improvement to this as well as girdle designs.
In most (not all) cases, 4-bolt blocks/caps aren't really needed. If the application isn't fretting the caps, more bolts aren't going to help.
Who spins a pickup truck engine high enough to need four-bolt mains? I think it'd take some seriously heavy load to move the caps around at 4K rpm. Of course, detonation will do that.
It's never a good idea to detonate an engine at heavy load. Light-load detonation was called "The Sound Of Economy" by GM in the '70s.
Another thought...The 1963 Daytona 500 "Chevrolet Mystery Engines" set speed records in qualifying, and a car powered by the "Mystery Engine" (prototype for the 1965 "Mark IV" Big Block 396) won the race. They all had two-bolt mains.