1992 Y-body: 205/207 0.451/0.450 lift 117 LSA
1993-1995 Y-body, F-body: 202/207 0.450/0.460 lift 116 LSA
1994-1996 B-bodies (including L99 4.3L): 191/196 0.418/0.430 lift 111 LSA
1996 Y-body, 1996-1997 F-body: 200/207 0.447/0.459 lift 117 LSA
1996 Y-body, F-body LT4: 203/210 0.476/0.479 lift 115 LSA
Comp XR252HR: 200/206 0.472/0.480 110 LSA
Comp XR258HR: 206/212 0.480/0.487 110 LSA
Comp XR264HR: 212/218 0.487/0.495 110 LSA
Just one portion of one company's offerings for cams with great torque, power, and mileage. These are all ground on a fairly tight (for factory fuel injection) 110 LSA, and are more aggressive than their Xtreme 4x4 and Computer Controlled lines which are ground on a slightly wider LSA. Their mildest in this lineup, MILDEST, is on par with the last of the LTI F and Y body cams, which are only ground on a wider LSA. True, wider LSA will shift the powerband and torque curve up, but not stratospherically. Hell, the LT4 factory cam has less lift and duration on 1.5's than the second smallest cam in the XR lineup. For what Comp (or anybody) charges for a hydraulic roller cam, you can have a used Fbody cam AND an S10 converter to bring you into the meat of the torque curve. Saying that stock Fbody cams have no place in a truck engine is borderline absurd. They run well, tow well, make great power, and are cheap. What more could you want?