I pulled an 8.5 rear axle assembly in favor of a 14SF 9.5 axle. It was a great swap, I got bigger, better brakes. I had zero need for additional weight-carrying capacity, but I did like the fact that the 14-bolt wasn't worn-out and sloppy like the original 8.5.
Having said that, this ongoing argument about overloading and wheels flying off makes me laugh.
I personally rode in a Dodge 1/2-ton, six lazy cylinders too tired to stand up straight, and a puny three-speed transmission. Pure poverty-model from the mid-70s. I bet it didn't have 100 horsepower.
There were three of us in the cab. We drove to the mine, they loaded a ton-plus of coal in the box, and we drove 30 miles home at about 20 mph, with the truck never coming off the bump-stops.
That truck went it's whole life with it's tongue hangin' out. No wheels ever flew off.
I have another friend that does property maintenance, self-employed. He loaded a Ranchero like it was a 3/4 ton pickup. He loads his 1/2 ton like it was a 1-ton. And you can't believe the crap he's carried on his '52 Ford Flathead 2-ton truck.
You must be registered for see images
Or a one-room schoolhouse on his triple-axle trailer, and the rear of the truck on the bump-stops. The trailer was loaded so heavy that one tire was rubbing the underside of the trailer--the springs were collapsed. That tire went from half-tread to showing cords in forty miles. We trailed smoke and haze as the tire rubbed itself bald.
You must be registered for see images
I am NOT saying that Dodge and Ford trucks are tougher than GM. I'm saying that a damned large segment of the population has semi-float axles, yet broken axles and wheels-in-the-ditch seem to be quite rare.